Sunday, August 26, 2018

Dreaming about education - US charter schools





Not too far away in time... the realm of public schools.

A few years ago families went to the neighborhood school. In this context, families could only choose a school if they could decide the neighborhood in which they lived and the housing market capitalized part of the added value of education. Literature in the last two decades has spoken of the benefits that the greater choice of center would have for the performance of children, schools and the equity of the system. In parallel, more than half of the OECD countries have expanded the possibility of choosing through voucher programs (school vouchers) or allowing families to access school.

A taste or an illusion of free choice? public, charter or private schools?

Letting families go to their favorite school is not always feasible given that for some schools the capacity of the classrooms is limited, less than the number of families that want to access them. Therefore, to let them choose supposes to also establish criteria that define who is going to accede to an over-demanded school and what other options will have those that do not enter in their wished option. 

Nowadays, a parent knows perfectly well that public education is widespread and that the percentage of immigrants that populate public classrooms does not stop growing. If the family is of upper socioeconomic status, they will not have problem in paying for their children a private education. If the family is of middle or lower socioeconomic status, the charter school will suppose one of their best options to offer them a quality education at a more or less affordable price. What if the family is of the lower socioeconomic status? Most likely their only option is a public school whose decline in recent years is undeniable. And yet, even if some authorities want to hide it disguising the statistics, public education is still winning the game to private education where it hurts the most, in the official tests like STAAR in Texas.

Who, What, Where, When, and Why: Demographic and Ecological Factors Contributing to Hostile School Climate for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth
J Youth Adolescence (2009) 38:976–988 DOI 10.1007/s10964-009-9412-1

Why are charter schools considered one of the best options?


The educational offer in charter schools are presented as "à la carte" where parents can choose their preferences and interests for their children. There, parents are going to be listened and their opinions considered in a significant way, far from what usually happens in public schools -or at least, that´s the idea of most parents-. 

Public schools have more money to invest in their system, but something is happening when most parents, including middle and low-middle socioeconomic status ones, have their options for a charter schools. Charter schools follow the (global) trends of education and they are more opened to "innovative" ideas that can fit what society demands in the moment, what as for public schools it seems to take longer and whose processes present many obstacles.

Besides, "charter" parents´ concerns about education differs from the "public" parents since they are more worried about their children´s learning developments than obtaining higher scores. They think, according to some polls and surveys, that their children are going to be better formed and more educated since their curriculum are going to fit their interests, like bilingual education based on linguistic immersion, for instance.

Another important issue to be mentioned is that one about behavior. Most charter schools don´t face really behavioral problems with their students due to the students´ parent involvement and participation in school that is higher than the one in public schools. This could be explained because of the money they spent on that school what means a more serious responsibility, or at least, it could be considered like this. 

"Not surprisingly, there is an underlying assumption that charter schools involve more parents both quantitatively and qualitatively. The theory posits that charter school parents, because they actively choose to send their child to a charter school, will be more involved than parents whose children are automatically assigned to a district-run school "
(Goldring & Shapira, 1993)


Some points to take into account:


The lack of central or federal control on the part of the autonomous states (especially with the charter and private schools) entails the existence of certain "peculiarities" of our system that, in other places, do not exist.

The demographics of the neighborhoods where the schools are located, that is, the design of the school map. This design by neighborhoods or districts will create a new concept of the quality of educational centers. What is relevant is that this advantage in the "options" allows them a different strategic behavior and that generates a negative effect in the rest. Specifically what happens with the current mechanism is that families with resources have more incentives to apply for places in the best public schools (because they risk less) and that means that they are over-represented in these schools (regarding their size in the population ). Therefore, low-income families will tend to concentrate on the worst public schools.

As for the arguments that the system favors those who can afford a private school, it would be interesting to see how the crisis, which will have reduced the number of families that can afford a private school, would affect those results.

Now, getting this point look at this picture

http://www.capenet.org/pdf/Outlook421.pdf
After that, if the survey shows that "charter" parents are not the most satisfied with teachers who are the ones that direct their children´s educational trajectory, then where is the satisfaction coming from?

Interview about Charter schools by Sarah A. Cordes


Websites:

  • http://web.cortland.edu/andersmd/psy501/charter.pdf
  • https://blog.ed.gov/2014/04/department-of-education-releases-new-parent-and-community-engagement-framework/
  • https://www.educationnext.org/what-americans-think-about-their-schools/
  • https://www.educationnext.org/charters-and-common-good-spillover-effects-charter-schools-new-york-city/
  • http://www.capenet.org/facts.html
  • http://www.capenet.org/pdf/Outlook421.pdf
  • https://www.the74million.org/a-huge-for-profit-charter-network-uses-the-same-approaches-as-high-performing-nonprofits-the-results-are-impressive/



References:

  • Kosciw, J.G., Greytak, E.A. & Diaz, E.M. J Youth Adolescence (2009) 38: 976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9412-1 DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9412-1 Publisher NameSpringer US  Print ISSN0047-2891 Online ISSN1573-6601
  • Ruth Curran Neild & Robert Balfanz (2006) An Extreme Degree of Difficulty: The Educational Demographics of Urban Neighborhood High Schools, Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 11:2, 123-141, DOI: 10.1207/s15327671espr1102_1
  • Lipman, P. (2013) Chapter 3 Desmantling Public Schools, Displacing African American and Latinos/as in The New Political Economy of Urban Education: Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City. New York. Taylor & Francis (Ed.)

Friday, August 24, 2018

Urban Education - day 1

Urban Education - Day 1

UH PhD CUIN 2018-2019


Last Monday our first classroom was really interesting. It´s amazing how education can be "labeled" according to the setting, conditions, needs, culture, people, economy and many other situations when and where it takes place. This subject is about Urban Education.

After reading some of the articles in our classroom and our conversation I would like to share all this with you all:

Education is a fundamental human right, which must be able to be exercised by all the inhabitants of a State, whatever the area where they are located. However, according to the U.S. Constitution education is not a fundamental right but an ‘important service’. Every state (with the exception of Hawaii) has relied heavily on local property tax revenues to fund public schools. Such a system amounts to socioeconomic-discrimination, as more affluent school districts with more businesses and higher residential property values have been able to raise more money from local sources than poorer districts. 

Before its definition I´d like to share with you an interesting point that we mentioned in class but another author did too: what do people think about what Urban Education is?

In this article the author summarizes the different opinions by a personal poll:


"The general perception (based on personal survey) of an urban educational setting is as following:
Based in an urban metropolis (Los Angeles, Miami, Dallas, New York City, Chicago, etc)
Varying student demographics (Immigrants, low-income, low socio-economic status, etc)
Generally poor student behavior and involvement; high pregnancy, drop out and crime rates
Limited academic success and background of students
Limited involvement of parents
High teacher turn-over rate; unable to handle urban school setting
Run-down campus, limited budgets, and large class sizes
“No one cares”mentality
School located in poverty-stricken neighborhood, high crime rates, influence of gangs, etc.
Generally associated with specific demographics: Hispanic and African-American

The author also shares another opinion:

“Many Americans believe that urban schools are failing to educate the students they serve. Even among people who think that schools are doing a good job overall are those who believe that in certain schools, conditions are abysmal. Their perception, fed by numerous reports and observations, is that urban students achieve less in school, attain less education, and encounter less success in the labor market later in life” (Lipman, Burns, and McArthur, 1996).

What is Urban education?

According to the website Enciclopedia we can read the definition of urban as "...is simply "a term pertaining to a city or town." In everyday parlance the term is used frequently to distinguish something from the terms rural, small town, suburban, or ex-urban. These objective size and density definitions, however, do not convey the range of meanings intended or received when the term is most commonly used. Perceptions of urban areas differ widely."

So there are generally two ways to take into account its definition: 
  • as a spatial context (geography), by identifying what happens within this framework but without considering that it has properties likely to impact significantly from which goes to the educational level 
  • as a social process, where it is considered that the educational activity is embedded in a tissue of social relations that are primordial to decipher in order to understand what is happening in education. 

Education in an urban environment is basically attached to the concept of geography, taking into account all the circumstances and situations that affect its overall system, the context and the particular social processes inherent to the site effect, which is never neutral.

When did Urban Education appear?

The concept of U.E. is parallel to the growth of urban areas. During the first half of the 20th century urban areas were viewed by many as economically dynamic, attracting and employing migrant populations from small towns, rural areas and abroad. During the second half of the 20th century however the term urban became a pejorative code word for the problems caused by the large numbers of poor and minorities who live in cities. Such negative perceptions of urban profoundly affect education and shape the nature of urban schooling.


Urban education offers many more opportunities, because there are more schools, which adapt to a massive enrollment, with more technology, better teachers (since few want to resign the convenience of working in cities to do it in remote places, with little or complicated communication through public transport, and with very little salary difference).












Both pictures belong to the article "Increasing Racial Diversity in the Teacher Workforce: One University’s Approach" (pdf version)


Another image that that reflects the country’s public-school student population:
SOURCE: 2014 U.S. Department of Education, Higher Education Act Title II State Report Card System (AY 2012-13 data)
SOURCE: 2015-16 Teach For America Official Statistics Report “Corps Size & Demographics: 2015-16”
SOURCE: 2012-13 U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data

As a possible solution to the diversity of the classrooms we can read the following excerpt from the article "Student Diversity, TFA, And The Teaching Workforce: What The Numbers Tell Us":

        "TFA is committed to dramatically increasing the diversity of America’s teacher workforce across multiple dimensions. We work to recruit accomplished individuals with a variety of backgrounds and experiences, including teachers with STEM expertise, LGBTQ teachers, military veteran teachers, teachers of color, and teachers with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status."

In this article the Association of Teachers for America analyzes the diversity in US public schools, and as we can read above, to deal with the diversity in schools districts decided to start hiring teachers that belong to this diversity too.


What are the challenges in U.Ed.?

In the article Urban Education: The State of Urban Schooling at the Start of the 21st Century by the The Haberman Educational Foundation we have a list of its challenges:

1. Highly Politicized School Boards
Board politics in major urban school districts often impede judicious decision-making (Ortiz, 1991) Two practices are particularly dysfunctional. First, in an effort to better represent diverse constituencies, citywide board seats have given way to narrowly drawn district seats. Board members elected from such districts may find it difficult to support policies and budgets aimed at the good of the total district when doing so is viewed negatively by parents, citizens and educators in their own neighborhood schools. Second, board members too frequently try to micromanage large, complicated school organizations thereby abrogating the leadership and accountability of their own superintendent. Finally, it is not unusual for narrow majorities on boards to change after a board election and for a superintendent to find his/her initiatives no longer supported and even have his/her contract bought out.

2. Superintendent Turnover
The average years of service for an urban superintendent are 2 and 1/3yrs. (Urban Indicator, 2000). As a result a new superintendent may function more as a temporary employee of a school board than as the educational leader of the district and the community. Administrators and teachers are reluctant to throw themselves into new initiatives that are not likely to remain in place long enough to show any results. Constituencies (governments, businesses, church groups, foundations, universities, etc.) with whom the superintendent must interact may take a wait and see attitude rather than become active partners in the new superintendent’s initiatives.

3. Principals as Managers and Leaders. 
The size and complexity of most urban schools inevitably lead to a focus on the principal as the manager or CEO of a major business enterprise. This emphasis has led to a transformation of the traditional principal role as an instructional leader. (Haberman, 2001) Few urban districts dismiss principals because of low student achievement unless the achievement falls low enough for the school to be taken over by the state or district and be reconstituted. In practice the typical urban principal who is transferred or coaxed into retirement is one that has “lost control of the building.” The district’s stated system of accountability may place student learning as the highest priority but the real basis for defining urban principals as “failing” is not because they have been unable to demonstrate increasing student achievement but because they have been unable to maintain a custodial institution. The fact that most urban principals spend the preponderance of their time and energy on management issues demonstrates that they fully understand this reality. (Kimball & Sirotnik, 2000)

4. Government Oversight. 
Local and state government officials involve themselves more and more in educational policies that impact urban districts. This politicization of education produces an endless stream of regulations and funding mechanisms, which encourage or penalize the efforts of local urban districts. Like an overmedicated patient the treatments frequently counteract one another or have unintended negative consequences.

5. Central Office Bureaucracies. 
In rural, small town and suburban districts, classroom teachers comprise 80% or more of the school district’s employees. In the 120 largest urban districts the number of employees other than teachers is approaching a ratio of almost 2:1; that is, for every classroom teacher there are almost two others employed in the district ostensibly to perform services which would help these teachers. (Knott & Miller, 1987) The effect of this distortion is frequently a proliferation of procedures, regulations, interruptions and paperwork that impedes rather than facilitates student learning. Many teachers leaving urban districts cite paperwork and bureaucratic over regulation as among the most debilitating conditions they face.

The self-serving nature of the district bureaucracy frequently impedes initiatives, which would decentralize decision making and transfer power to individual school staffs. (McClafferty, 2000) Historically centralized systems are reluctant to change. Prodded by parents, community and business leaders, urban districts are gradually allowing more decentralized decision making at the school level. In response to bureaucratic rigidities choices are proliferating within public systems. Examples include open enrollment plans, magnet and specialty schools, schools-within-schools, alternative schools, and public choice and charter schools. Urban parents also have increased options outside the public systems through private school voucher programs but these efforts account for less than one percent of enrollment in urban districts. (Hill, 1999)

6. School Staff Accountability. 
As public school options increase so do calls for accountability. The most frequently tried accountability efforts in the last century have been attempts at merit pay for teachers based on student achievement test scores. Many of these trials have been funded by private foundations and several have been supported initially by local teachers unions. Thus far, however, there have been no successful models for holding either principals or teachers accountable based on achievement scores. (Ross, 1994) In some cases superintendents have clauses in their contracts stating that their tenure or salaries are dependent on improvements in student achievement. In some districts school principals’ annual evaluations and contract extensions are now tied to improving student achievement. Currently, many states have adopted systems for declaring particular schools (or districts) as failing if a given number of the school’s students are below a minimum level of achievement. In these cases the state may mandate that a failing school be reconstituted and may grant the local district the authority to re-staff the school with a new principal and teaching staff. (Crosby, 1999) The staff of a failing school is typically permitted to transfer to other schools in the district. This means that while an urban school district is being held accountable based on achievement data the individual staff members are not. Furthermore the concept of accountability is non-existent for curriculum specialists, hiring officials, or those who appoint principals, psychologists, safety aides or other school staff.

7. Teacher Shortages. 
The public clearly understand the importance of well-prepared teachers: 82% believe that the “recruitment and retention of better teachers is the most important measure for improving public schools, more effective than investing in computers or smaller class size.” (Education Commission of the States, 2000) In the next decade there may be as many as 1 million new teachers hired because of turnover, retirement and the fact that the typical teaching career has shortened to approximately 11 years. (Langdon & Vesper, 2000) If the school age population continues to increase, another million teachers may be needed. While all districts face occasional selected shortages of special education teachers, bilingual teachers, math or science teachers, the major impact of the current and continuing teacher shortage falls on the urban school districts. These are the teaching positions that many traditionally prepared teachers are unwilling to take. This problem is confounded by the fact that many urban districts must lay off teachers to make up for budget deficits in a given year while they are simultaneously recruiting teachers to remedy their chronic shortages. (Reid, 2002)

In the states that prepare a majority of the teachers in traditional university based programs more than half of those who graduate and are certified never take teaching positions. (Schug, 1997) “ One third of new teachers leave the profession within five years.” (Education Commission of the States, 2000) The typical teacher education graduate is a 22-year-old white female, monolingual with little work or life experience. She will teach within fifty miles of where she herself attended school. The profile of teachers who succeed and stay in urban school districts differs in important respects. (Sprinthall, 1996) While they are still predominantly women, they are over 30 years of age, attended urban schools themselves, completed a bachelor’s degree in college but not necessarily in education, worked at other full-time jobs and are parents themselves. This successful pool also contains a substantially higher number of individuals who are African American, Latino and male. Typically, the teacher educators who serve as faculty in traditional university-based teacher preparation programs have had little or no teaching experience in urban school districts while those mentoring teachers in alternative licensure programs typically come from long, successful careers as teachers in urban districts.

8. State Licensure Laws. 
While traditional teacher preparation programs seek to attract more young people into the teaching profession, past experience suggests that many of these graduates will not seek employment in large urban school districts where most of the new hires will be needed. (Schug 1997) To assist in meeting this urban district need, new kinds of recruiting and training programs are being established to attract older, more experienced and more diverse candidates into the teaching profession. States differ widely in their response to these new programs. “Conventional wisdom holds that the key to attracting better teachers is to regulate entry into the classroom ever more tightly…” while others argue that “the surest route to quality is to widen the entryway, deregulate the processes, and hold people accountable for their results…” (Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, 1999) Forty-three states have passed alternative licensure laws which permit the hiring of college graduates who were not trained in traditional programs of teacher preparation. But licensure requirements vary greatly across the states and implementation of new approaches is often controversial even though an increasing number of urban districts now “grow their own” teachers using alternative training programs. (Feistritzer, 1993)

9. Funding for Districts and Classrooms. 
Students in urban school districts often have substantially less annual per student support than they need. The level of support in urban districts, however, generally exceeds the per pupil expenditures in small towns and rural areas. Many argue, therefore, that in total there is no shortage of funds for urban schools especially when categorical aids and grants are considered. The overall problem of inadequate funding is often exacerbated after the urban school district receives its funds and distributes the monies from the central office levels to the individual schools. Too often too many funds are expended to maintain central office functions leaving too little to cover the direct costs of instruction and equipment in specific school buildings. In addition, many urban districts are characterized by buildings that are outmoded, even unsafe, creating conditions which make learning problematic. New York City, for example, has over 150 buildings still heated by coal.

10. Projectitis. 
New school board members and superintendents often believe they must set their personal stamps on the district through new initiatives. It is common for urban districts to claim they are aware of and experimenting with the latest curricula in reading, math, science, etc. (Schuttloffel, 2000). In addition, administrators are pressured to try out new programs against drugs, violence, gangs, smoking, sex, etc. This proliferation of programs and projects results in so many new initiatives being tried simultaneously it is not possible to know which initiative caused what results. Furthermore, not enough time is devoted to the program to give it sufficient time to demonstrate intended results. The problem is compounded by the fact that many of these new initiatives are not systematically or carefully evaluated. Veteran teachers, when confronted with the latest initiative from the school board or administration, typically become passive resistors. “This too shall pass.” The constant claims of experts, school boards and superintendents that their latest initiative will transform their schools is frequently stonewalled by the very people who must be the heart of the effort for it to succeed. (Van Dunk, 1999)

11. Narrowing Curriculum and Lowering Expectations. 
As presented in state and local district philosophy and mission statements the list of what the American people generally expect from their public schools is impressive. A typical list is likely to include the following goals for students: basic skills; motivated life long learners; positive self concept; humane, democratic values; active citizens; success in higher education and in the world of work; effective functioning in a culturally diverse society and a global economy; technological competence; development of individual talents; maintenance of physical and emotional health; appreciation and participation in the arts. In many suburban and small town schools the parents, community and professional school educators maintain a broad general vision about the goals that 13 years of full time schooling is supposed to accomplish. But in the urban districts serving culturally diverse students in poverty these broad missions are frequently narrowed down to “getting a job and staying out of jail.” (Russell, 1986)

Narrowing down the curriculum is particularly evident among the burgeoning populations of students labeled as special or exceptional. The urban districts have disproportionately large and wildly accelerating numbers of students labeled with some form of disability. In urban districts the numbers of special students currently range from 6% to 20% of the student body. This means that exceptional education may account for between 20 and 35% of a total urban district’s budget. Well intentioned but sometimes misapplied state and federal initiatives for special education students encourage the labeling of increasing numbers of students as learning disabled, cognitively disabled or having attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. (Breggin & Breggin, 1994) It is not uncommon for many urban teachers who do not have in depth knowledge of child development to perceive undesirable behavior as abnormal rather than as a temporary stage or as student responses to poor teaching. Thus it is common in urban middle schools to find many students doing well academically who have been labeled as disabled in primary grades and who will carry these labels throughout the remainder of their school careers. Teacher expectations are likely to be very modest for such children; testing may be waived. Some low-income parents may be enticed to agree to have their children labeled exceptional because of financial grants. Recent efforts at inclusion for exceptional students in regular classrooms are aimed at breaking the cycle of low expectations and isolation. In urban districts, however, inclusion mandates are most frequently followed in the primary grades but seldom at the high school level. (Cohen, 2001) The disproportionate number of children of color, particularly males, labeled exceptional further exacerbates this problem.

12. Achievement and Testing. 
There are four curricula operating in schools. The first is the broadest. It is the written mission of the school district. The second curriculum is what the teachers actually teach. The third operative curriculum is what the students actually learn which is considerably less than what the district claims or what the teachers teach. The fourth curriculum is what is tested for and this is the narrowest of the four. The tested for curriculum frequently supports the narrowing and lowering of expectations. (D’Amico, 1985) As total school and district programs are evaluated by norm referenced tests the accountability of teachers and principals is also narrowed and lowered to the kinds of learning that can be readily tested. Recognition of this problem has led to a new emphasis on standards-led testing or performance assessment closely linked to curriculum in place of the norm reference testing that compares student’s performance to that of others. Done carefully, such assessment measures the performance of successive cohorts of students against an annual rate of improvement (local or state) that is sufficient to achieve whatever curriculum goals have been set. (Education Commission of the States , 1997) For the most part, aligning the goals, curriculum, instruction and testing is yet to be accomplished.


The Haberman Educational Foundation in its article shows a detailed information about the characteristics of the U.Ed. students and their characteristics as well as a huge list of references.

Urban Education and Movies

Looking for information in the world-known browser "google", I´ve found something really interesting: one article that talks about the urban movies whose common denominator is how their characters, urban teenagers, struggle in unstable environments.

One of my favorite is "Dangerous Minds" with an excellent sound track.


What´s your favorite movie? You can choose your movie clicking here.


Now that I´m talking about that movie set in the mid 1990s, another thing caught my attention. If all those problems were already happening in that period, what has changed? So, again back to google and I try to look more information about U.Ed. and found this interesting article A New Era in Urban Education? where we can read many characteristics of the schools and students of that period that are still happening 20 years later. Those issues that are present in our schools are the challenges to deal with low-income students and families, but there was a new topic: "charter schools" that according to the ideas of the year of the article (1998) these schools would give an answer to their problems. I don't want to go on talking about charter schools because it´s a topic that we will deal with during our second session. Be patient!


References and articles


  • http://www.right-to-education.org/page/understanding-education-right
  • https://learningandurbaneducation.wordpress.com/
  • https://nces.ed.gov





Research on Parent Engagement

Research: Parent Engagement in School Communities


This is my post where we´ll be sharing my information about parent engagement. This information will be updated according to the new information we´ll be acquiring and finding, above all from public schools.


Introduction: Parents, educators, administrators and students in school communities.

It´s well known that the educational process begins in the family, at least this is what most of us think, and continues in school. All this process needs both parties to achieve full development. The school must be clear about the importance of the participation and collaboration of parents in the education of their children as well as the need for an open relationship to perform their function in a complete manner. Sometimes the role of the parents can be confused with that of the teachers, and it is noted that not all parents and teachers have the same educational goals.

WHAT is Parent Engangement?

There are parents who feel comfortable in school, have trusting relationships with teachers, and there are others who approach the school less confident and disoriented. There are some educators who are somewhat afraid of the interview because they feel none.

Both parents and teachers, or in other words, both the family and the school have partly common and partly complementary roles. The roles of the school are related to pedagogical learning, teachers choose the most beneficial pedagogical method, content, goals,... for their students.

The roles of parents cover more, they are the first educators but not the only ones. It is true that parents know their children and know how is their temperament, their reactions and emotions. Therefore, it is essential that the teacher listen to the parents, take into account their situation and know their family reality to be able to reach the student's process, just as the good doctor is right in his diagnosis when the patient gives him the data that they personalize and transform the patient in person.


WHERE and WHEN?

Parent engagement can be done in many ways. Most of the parents have jobs and other responsibilities that impedes them to be present in school during instruction time. However, current schools have a flexible schedule that is not fixed only during the "mornings". Most schools have "afterschool" activities and other events programmed by the same school or other institutions or associations linked to the school. Therefore, parents can find a place and a time to participate with their children.

Home is another place where parents can colaborate from, as well, by offering their help and support in many ways. There are some programs like HIPPY in HISD who offer home support for Early Childhood students in the district.


Figure 1: HISD Participation from their Memorandum in 2017.

WHY? 

Why is too important to colaborate with parents and educators?  It would be a disaster for those who do not have to know the pedagogy and methodology of the sciences or other school subjects to do the programming of it/them. It would be unfortunate that those who are going to improve our health, prescribe what is best for us with no knowledge of health or having a degree as a physician. Parents and teachers are the two pilars that welcome, encourage, help, accompany our students and support them during their successful lives, both of them are indispensable in this amazing vital journey.

Figure 2: English Language and Literacy CIRCLE subtests 2017 from Memorandum in 2017.

Figure 2: Spanish Language and Literacy CIRCLE subtests 2017 from Memorandum in 2017.

These figures show the results when combining parents and teachers´colaboration in the Houston Independent School District with the HIPPY program for their young students. As a former HISD Dual-Language PreK teacher in the district I was a witness of the success of this program involving parents in their children´s education, especially among Latino families.

How?


Here you can find several recommendations and suggestions that we believe can help you, as parents, and your children, our students, since we share the same vision: their success in life through education.  We are convinced that participation is the most appropriate way for teachers and families to validate their competence as parents and teachers mutually.

The allowance of participations is complex but we can find help and support in your school. Most districts provide a "FACE" (Family and Community Empowerment) worker who can help you with all this process. There are many papers and documents to fill in and do some registrations. Be patient, please! All this task is for the safety of our students, staff and other school community members. We recommend you to be informed in your school as soon as the school year begins, since all this process can last for several weeks or even one month´s time in some cases.

After being admitted and approved, visit your assigned counselor or FACE worker to introduce you to the activities and other institutions/associations participating in the school community. Parental involvement is an important factor in their academic success. Most schools have PTO or PTA  that can help you as well with your active participation in schools.

Communication and values: improving our relationships in school communities.

School-to-Home Communication Infographic


Communication is going to be the base of the succesful academic performances of our students. This communication should be based on a daily interaction with students-parents-educators, because all of them are responsible for the success of their process of education and lives.

The improvement of communication processes between parents and teachers is probably one of the greatest needs that our educational system has. The benefits it brings to the students as well as to the teachers and parents. The parents, through their active participation, get involved with the teachers´ tasks, discover that they are really important in the education of their children; they can feel more comfortable communicating with teachers, discover how their children work at school and, finally, parents acquire skills that help them to take advantage of tutoring with teachers.

By involving parents, it is possible for teachers to gain a greater understanding of the difficulties that prevent parents from getting involved in their children's education and, from this understanding, they learn strategies on how to reach all parents effectively, such as active listening, understanding of defensive behaviors and conflict resolution.

Teachers feel less isolated and schools are encouraged to develop activities that encourage very varied forms of parental involvement. The children-students discover the shared vision expressed by teachers and parents. The children-students do not use the information they transmit to their parents and teachers in a biased way.

However... after agreeing that participation is very beneficial, why is it so hard to carry it out? Why do some parents and teachers perceive each other as a source of conflict, rather than as a source of help?



https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qawp93xyQJI/maxresdefault.jpg

First, we must bear in mind that participation involves communication and this is a source of conflict too, that is, when a person, whether a father, a mother, teacher,... expose their ideas, necessarily they are confronted with the ideas the others have. And we usually have a tendency to interpret communicative conflicts as a "problem", and not as a starting point to put together (parents and teachers) our possibilities to respond to the demands of our children, our students.

Secondly, for participation to take place it is necessary that parents and teachers have a feeling of belonging to an educational community (being a part), but to participate, it is also necessary to be aware of the rights and duties that parents and teachers have and also to be aware that the benefits and costs are shared (having part) and, finally, we must be able to develop motivation for the development of specific activities (take part).

Third, we must bear in mind that, in the communicative process, we see and hear in a selective way based on our needs, motivations, experiences, interests, personal expectations, education and other personal characteristics. And this way of perceiving reality is different in parents and teachers, and that is why it can generate conflicts.

Fourth, communication between parents and teachers has an important emotional burden: let's not forget that children are the most important people for their parents.

If we do the same things as before, we will get the same results. Einstein.

I would like to conclude by reaffirming that the teachers are doing an exceptional task to respond to the needs of their students, that parents are willing to do "whatever" for their children, and that we need each other, we need to be able to establish mutual commitments that benefit our children, we need to be able to validate each other as what we are: teachers and parents. So go for the FACE/PTO/PTA member of the school and participate, it's never too late!


Educational celebration is given when those hands come together and celebrate. 


Other related articles and information:

  • http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/12/17/parenting-in-america/
  • http://blogs.houstonisd.org/news/2017/06/06/hisd-face-is-now-the-family-and-community-empowerment-department/
  • http://www.pto.org/
  • https://www.pta.org/
  • http://www.faces-cares.org/
  • http://neatoday.org/
  • https://parents4publicschools.org/
  • http://blogs.longwood.edu/parentinvolvement/
  • https://peopleforeducation.ca/topics/parent-involvement/
  • https://tomorrow.org/speakup/speakup-2016-school-to-home-communications-september-2017.html

by
Dr. Nicole Andews
Dr. Neelu Tajani
A.R. Ms. Xuan Li
A. R. Mr. Francisco Usero Gonzalez



Monday, August 13, 2018

Early Childhood Language Development Series: Language Stimuli - The importance of the family and school

Language Stimuli - The importance of the family and school
Early Childhood Language Development Series


Language is a true mechanism to think. Language makes thought more abstract, flexible and independent of immediate stimuli. That is why it allows us to imagine, manipulate, create new ideas and share them with others; is one of the ways by which we exchange information; hence, language plays two roles: it is instrumental in the development of cognition, but it is also part of the cognitive process.

The use of oral language in pre-school education has the highest priority, since in this stage the expansion and enrichment of speech as well as the identification and characteristics of language are competences that children develop to the extent that they are offered communication opportunities everyday


Development of oral language in 4-5-year-old children.


Articulated language is the most distinctive feature among humans and, approximately, it is dominated around five or six years of age in children (Condemarín, Chadwick, and Milicic,1995). Language is one of the most important learning acquired by children in their first years of life, when the first social interactions occur, laying the foundations for future learning, hence the teacher of Early Childhood Education have to pay special attention to the acquisition and development of the language as well as its possible alterations.

The family, as a frame of reference and an essential element of the child's environment is, together with the school, the main agent of the total practice of learning. Linguistic learning can not be subtracted from this principle for two fundamental reasons: on the one hand, it is worth remembering that people (with some exceptions) spend most of their childhood with their family; besides of this, the great influence we exert on children with our attitudes and behaviors, it will be clear the key role played by the family in the communicative development of people. Therefore, nobody better than the family itself, with a series of easy-to-follow principles and guidelines when communicating with their children, become a vital element for the proper development of language.

When there is no relationship and communication between children and adults, the development of communication skills stops, so that, apart from having biological faculties for speech, the child must have an adequate social environment, as affectivity plays an important role in the acquisition of language. The desire or not to communicate is determined by positive or negative relationships with the next persons (parents); When there are affective deficiencies, it can sink into silence.

It is important to consider that when we address the child try to do it as clearly as possible, slowly and without raising your voice, so that we provide our adult language code to your abilities; which does not mean that we impoverish our expression or speak in a childish way, but rather to do it in an adjusted and precise way.

In the same sense, we must let the children express themselves and that they feel comfortable and safe in doing so; we must be patient and attentive to what he tells us, trying to provoke the maximum number of interventions on his part. The language is like an engine that must be constantly put into operation so that its parts are at full capacity.

Sunday, August 12, 2018

Early Childhood language development Series - Language Development I



The following series of posts are part of my research during my Early Childhood Teaching Bachelor Degree, more than five years ago.

Nowadays many students in Prek and K present problems at speaking, that is, their oral language development. This post and the following ones are going to help understand it a little more, or at least I hope so.

 Language Development Introduction
(Early Childhood Language Develpment Series)


What is Language? by The Open University


What do we understand by language?
Language is a complex function that allows expressing and perceiving affective states, concepts, ideas... through acoustic or graphic signs. The function of the language implies:

    • A system of rules: language is the one that specifies the way to use verbal material to mean (symbolize) external or imaginary reality.

      • The materialization of this system of rules in oral and writing language.

Language is the most characteristic feature of the Human Beings and is distinctive with respect to other species. All animal species have behaviors to communicate, but in none of them we can find something similar to language. By language it is necessary to understand "that complex function that allows to express and perceive affective states, concepts, ideas, by means of acoustic or graphic signs"

The language is a system of signs or symbols that are used for communication in a particular coding, for the representation of objects, people, events, thoughts... this representation involves physical and physiological (acoustic-perceptive), cognitive, emotional and social processes.

The development of the linguistic system is essential for social and intellectual development and vice versa. Therefore, to evaluate the development of language is to evaluate the development of an interactive communication system that serves to establish contact with our surrounding world, to establish relationships to learn and be able to think (Del Barrio, 1997).


The functions of language are communication and representation.

Language enhances cognitive development, and vice versa. Language is acquired in and through the social medium; the social environment, in turn, conditions the type of language.

The language is affected by affective deficiencies.


What is the acquisition of language?

It represents a great change, since the communicative possibilities with itself and with others are extended. Language is an instrument of knowledge and transformation of reality.

Children begin to use language not because they have an ability to use language, but because they need to achieve the realization of things that their use confers on them. Parents help them with a similar spirit: they want to help them become civilized human beings, not just language speakers. (Bruner, 1986).

In my next posts I´ll talk about the dimensions of language.

Related links:

- https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-language.html



- https://www.slideshare.net/JorgeRengifo3/principles-of-language-learning-and-teaching